Four keystroke sequences and one setting that hides r until you turn it on. That setting is why most people end up searching for this.
The screen returns the regression equation, then a, b, r², and r. The last line is your correlation coefficient.
This is the whole problem for most people. The TI-84 computes r either way, then declines to display it unless a setting is switched on. You get the slope and intercept, no correlation, and no error message explaining why.
The fix depends on how new the calculator is.
Run LinReg again and r² and r now appear at the bottom. The setting persists until the memory is reset, which is why it works on a classmate's calculator and not yours.
Twelve students, hours studied against exam score.
| L1 (hours) | L2 (score) |
|---|---|
| 2 | 57 |
| 3 | 69 |
| 4 | 56 |
| 5 | 63 |
| 6 | 50 |
| 7 | 75 |
| 8 | 71 |
| 9 | 81 |
| 10 | 69 |
| 11 | 76 |
| 12 | 80 |
| 13 | 77 |
With diagnostics on, LinReg(ax+b) on L1 and L2 returns:
y=ax+b
a=2.020979021
b=53.50932401
r²=.5183986799
r=.7199990833
So r = .72 and r² = .52. Hours and scores move together, and about 52% of the variance in scores is shared with hours studied.
A note on which LinReg to pick. 4:LinReg(ax+b) and 8:LinReg(a+bx) both work and both give the same r. They differ only in which coefficient is called a and which is called b. If your textbook writes the line as y = a + bx, use option 8 so the labels match.
The TI-84 has no rank function and no Spearman command. You rank by hand, then correlate the ranks.
For this data that gives rs = .75, slightly higher than Pearson's .72, which is what you expect when one point sits away from the line.
Sorting help: 2nd, STAT, arrow to OPS, 1:SortA( will sort a list ascending so you can read ranks off in order. Sort a copy, not your original paired lists, or you will break the pairing between L1 and L2.
LinReg stops at the coefficient. An r of .72 from twelve students and an r of .72 from twelve hundred are different findings, and this screen shows the same number for both.
The TI-84 can give you the test, just not from that menu. Press STAT, arrow to TESTS, and choose LinRegTTest. Set Xlist to L1, Ylist to L2, Freq to 1, and leave the alternative at ≠ 0. It returns t, p, df, and r together. For the data above: t = 3.28, df = 10, p = .008.
What it will not give you is a confidence interval for r, which needs a Fisher z transformation the calculator does not carry.
Skip the menus. Paste the same two columns into the correlation calculator and get r, r², the exact p value, a 95% confidence interval, and an APA 7 write-up in one step.
Open the correlation calculatorIf you have a browser rather than the handheld, Desmos will do it. Open a graphing calculator, add a table, put your pairs in x1 and y1, then type y_1 ~ mx_1 + b on a new line. Desmos fits the line and reports r² underneath. Take the square root for r, and give it the sign of the slope, since r² alone cannot tell you direction.
Past the point of a handheld? ReliCheck Quanta builds full correlation matrices with p values, scatterplots, and APA tables from your raw data on the Mac. Free to try.
Get Quanta